Reaction' or Mendel's laws of genetics or the Ideal Gas Law?" So you may be thinking, "OK, but what do those principles have to do with science? Whatĭoes 'I think, therefore I am' have to do with 'For every action there is an equal and opposite (In Part Four he also presented an argument to show that a benevolent,Īll-powerful, infinite, eternal, all-knowing divine being exists.) Place and depended on no material thing.") He will try to corroborate this one in Part Five.ĭescartes argued that these principles had to be true because his conceptions of them were veryĬlear and distinct, and argued that clear and distinct ideas were guaranteed to be true by theĭivine being. Whole essence or nature of which was merely to think, and which, in order to exist, needed no independence of mind from body (Descartes had concluded that he was "a substance the.The basic principles that Descartes discovered in Part Four, the two main things he concluded He did this because he wished to "seek truth in the sciences" (as the title of theĭiscourse indicates), and he held that the sciences took their basic principles from philosophy. In Part Four, Descartes had applied his 4-step method of investigation to some basic problems in Notes on Part Five of Descartes' Discourse Notes on Part Five of Descartes' Discourse
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |